Skip to content

Objections

An objection is any reason the lead gives for not buying now: the price, no budget, needing to check with someone, not seeing the time to implement it. TopClosers detects the objections in each call, scores how well they were rebutted and groups them so you can see which ones keep coming back across your whole agency.

Two things at once:

A per-call diagnosis

Which objections came up, how they were handled, what each one scored and what to say next time.

An agency report

Which objections recur, which are rebutted worst and whether the team is improving week over week.

There is nothing to configure: it is part of call analysis and shows up as soon as the first call with objections is analyzed.

  1. The call is analyzed. On top of scoring the phases of your sales manual, the AI identifies the pushbacks the lead raised and when.

  2. The handling is scored. Each objection is rated from 0 to 100 on how it was rebutted: whether the real concern was understood, whether the answer had substance and whether the conversation moved forward afterwards.

  3. It is mapped onto your agency’s catalogue. “It’s too expensive”, “I can’t afford that right now” and “that’s way over my budget” are not three different metrics: they roll up into the same category so you can count them together.

  4. It accumulates in the reports. With every analyzed call, the objection ranking and its trend fill in.

Every agency has its own catalogue. It starts with the objections any sales team meets — price, no budget, “I need to think about it”, checking with someone else, bad timing, doubts about results, tried it before, looking at other options, no time to implement, doesn’t need it — in your agency’s language.

From there, the catalogue learns:

  • When an objection fits an existing category, it counts there, even if the lead phrased it completely differently.
  • When a genuinely different pushback appears, a new category is opened.
  • The more you analyze, the more stable the grouping gets: categories stop moving and the figures become comparable across periods.

A category with no occurrences in the period is simply not shown: an empty row would read as “handled terribly” rather than “never came up”.

In the Objections and plan tab of the call detail, each objection carries:

ElementWhat it tells you
The detected objectionThe specific pushback the lead raised, and which catalogue category it counts under
How it was handledWhat the closer actually did with it
Handling qualityThe 0-to-100 score for that particular handling
What to say next timeA usable alternative, not a theory

It is the most directly actionable coaching material the analysis produces: readable and practisable in five minutes.

In Statistics, the Objection handling block shows:

  • The objection ranking, sorted by frequency: the one that comes up most often, first. Next to each, how many times it appeared in the period and its average handling score out of 100.
  • The “Focus area” badge on the categories with the worst average, so they stand out without breaking the frequency order.
  • The comparison with the previous period, in points: an objection going from 48 to 61 is up 13 points.
  • The trend of whichever objection you select, with its average across the period. “All objections”, the agency-wide aggregate, is shown by default.

The block respects the same scope as the rest of the page: the owner sees the team or one specific closer; a closer sees only their own objections.

The real value is in crossing the two columns: frequency and average score.

FrequencyAverage scoreWhat to do
HighLowYour next role-play. This is the objection costing you the most money
HighHighAlready solved. Document how it is rebutted and put it in the manual
LowLowIndividual script for whoever meets it, not team training
LowHighIgnore it this week

A routine that works:

  1. Every Monday, open Statistics on the 30-day period and look at the top two objections in the ranking.

  2. Pick the one with the worse average of those two: high frequency plus bad handling is the expensive combination.

  3. Pull real examples. Open two or three calls where it came up and read “How it was handled” and “What to say next time”.

  4. Run the role-play on those concrete cases, not on invented scenarios.

  5. Come back two weeks later and look at that objection’s trend. If it has not moved, the problem was not the script: it was the point in the sale where the objection appears.

If an objection is rebutted well consistently, that argument deserves a place in the sales manual as a criterion of the relevant phase. That way it stops depending on who is on the call.

  • It depends on the analysis. There are objections only where there are analyzed calls. A call with no transcript, a failed analysis or one left out of analysis contributes nothing.
  • Calls with no objections are normal. A call registering none is not a failure: on some calls the lead raises no explicit pushback.
  • The handling score is 0 to 100, different from the call score, which is out of 10. Do not compare them directly.
  • Few calls, little signal. A category with two occurrences does not describe your team. Start drawing conclusions once an objection has accumulated occurrences over several weeks.
  • All time has no comparison, because there is no previous window to contrast it with.
  • The report requires an active plan, like the rest of the AI analysis. See Plans and billing.
  • Work on one objection per week. Attacking five at once changes none of them.
  • Always read the ranking next to the funnel: if budget objections dominate, the problem is often not the close but the qualification before the appointment.
  • Turn every well-solved objection into manual text. The report tells you where it hurts; the manual is where it gets fixed permanently.
  • Compare your best closers’ objections with everyone else’s: they usually meet the same ones and handle them better, and that is the script already proven in your market.
  • Check the new categories from time to time. If one describes something real and recurring in your market, it deserves its own section in the manual.